
James Kendall, UAW Local 23 president
GM workers filled UAW Local 23 for the meeting Tuesday.
Ford lineman Frank Thompson assembles the 2009 Ford F-150 truck at the Dearborn Truck Assembly in Dearborn, Mich. (AP)Indianapolis - Local United Auto Workers union leaders and members are rallying in support of the proposed federal bailout.
The Senate auto bailout bill notes that 355,000 U.S. workers are directly employed by the auto industry, and an additional 4.5 million work in related industries. That doesn't count the one million retirees, spouses and dependents who rely on the firms for retirement and health care benefits.
"The impact would be huge. It would be devastating for folks if this company goes under. The trickle-down effect would be awesome. There might be a depression," said James Kendall, UAW Local 23 president.
Union members and GM plant managers - two groups usually at odds over contracts and pay - stood side-by-side inside UAW Local 23 headquarters to save their livelihoods Tuesday afternoon.
"I want to thank you for gathering here to fight the most important battle in our industry's history," said Indianapolis GM plant manager Jeff Haynes. "The stakes are huge."
"I look at the demise of the U.S. auto industry as the economic 9/11," said UAW leader Bill Matthews.
The city's GM Assembly Plant shut down for an hour Tuesday so workers could get an urgent message - to call their senator and tell him to vote in favor of a $25 billion auto industry bailout loan.
"Don't worry about Evan Bayh, he's in the pocket as usual," said Mark Ferrell with the UAW. "But we've got to get Lugar. We've got to get Lugar in line."
If not, industry analysts fear GM might not survive. That would have a detrimental effect on 725 Indianapolis workers.
"For me, myself, my job, my pension, my home," said UAW Local 23 President James Kendall.
For 3,300 GM retirees in the area, the future of their pensions and healthcare is up in the air, as well.
"I've been retired 13 years and I don't know what kind of impact it's going to have on me per se, but [a] safeguard is to get me a part-time job," said GM retiree Rudy Smith.
"All I've got right now is my pension, so if I lose that, I'm gone. I mean, there's nothing else I can do," said GM retiree Sandra Reeves. She is 67 years old with back problems and says it would be impossible for her to find a job.
At the meeting today, union members were urged over and over again to call Senator Lugar and ask him to vote in favor of the bailout loan. That vote could take place as early as Wednesday.
Paulson: 'There are other ways'
However, Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson told Congress on Tuesday that the administration remains firmly opposed to dipping into the government's $700 billion financial bailout fund for a $25 billion rescue package for Detroit's Big Three automakers, no matter how badly they need the help.
"There are other ways" to help battered automakers, Paulson told the House Financial Services Committee as the bailout bill clung to life support on Capitol Hill.
Committee members grilled Paulson on the administration's stance that the $25 billion must come from separate legislation passed by Congress in September. The measure was designed specifically to help auto manufacturers retool their factories so they can make more fuel-efficient vehicles.
The $700 billion bailout plan enacted by Congress in October and signed into law by President George W. Bush did not envision that the program would be used to help rescue non financial companies, Paulson said. "I believe the auto companies fall outside of that purpose."
At the same time, he testified, "I think it would be not a good thing, it would be something to be avoided, having one of the auto companies fail, particularly during this period of time."
Paulson said that solving the financial problems of the automakers should be done in a way "that leads to long-term sustainable viability" for the industry.
Auto executives, backed by leading Democrats, insist they need another $25 billion in emergency bridge loans - on top of the $25 billion already approved and being administered by the Energy Department - to avert a collapse of one or more of their companies.
That would bring the total federal help for the industry to $50 billion this year.
The executives, along with the head of the United Auto Workers union, were making their case at a hearing before the Senate Banking Committee as auto bailout backers hunted the votes necessary to pass the plan in a post election session. Aides in both parties and lobbyists tracking the plan privately acknowledge they are far short.
Karen Majewski, mayor of Hamtramck, Mich., said police, fire and public works departments would face major cuts if they lost tax factories from GM and American Axle plants in her city.
"We're talking about the lifeblood of our city," she said.
She was among local officials from cities with auto plants making the rounds on Capitol Hill on Tuesday, lobbying for the $25 billion in auto-industry bridge loans.
The debate comes as the financial situation for General Motors Corp., Ford Motor Co. and Chrysler LLC grows more precarious.
General Motors, Chrysler and Tesla Motors Inc. have already applied for loans under the existing $25 billion Energy Department program and Ford CEO Alan Mulally said the automaker plans to apply on Tuesday. GM, Chrysler and Ford have not disclosed the amount of aid they're seeking or for what purposes. Tesla said it was seeking about $400 million in loans for two projects.
Cash-strapped GM said it will delay reimbursing its dealers for rebates and other sales incentives and that it could run out of cash by year's end without government aid.
Mulally argued Tuesday in advance of the hearing that his company already been laboring to "transform our business" into a more profitable one that meets 21st century demands for fuel-efficient vehicles.
Interviewed on ABC's "Good Morning America," Mulally denied that automakers resisted restructuring their companies or that it has been badly managed.
Sen. Carl M. Levin, D-Mich., an architect of the auto bailout, said that auto executives need to address the perception by some lawmakers "that there's still some quality issues with the Big Three, and they haven't begun to do the necessary restructuring - because they have."
Levin's bill would provide loans with initial interest rates of 5 percent to the U.S. automakers and suppliers in exchange for a federal stake in the companies or warrants that would let the government profit from future gains. Loan applicants would have to give the government a plan for "long-term financial viability."
But it stops short of giving the government a say over the firms' operations through an oversight board or hard limits on executive compensation. While taking advantage of the program, the companies could not pay dividends, award bonuses to executives making more than $250,000 a year, or give golden parachute payments to top people departing from the firms.
A vote on the measure - which includes an extension of jobless benefits - could come as early as Thursday. But Majority Leader Harry Reid, D-Nev., also laid the groundwork for a straight up-or-down vote on the more widely supported unemployment measure, which is probably all that can pass this week.
(Copyright 2008 Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.)
Comments Terms of Use: We welcome your participation in our community. Please keep your comments civil and on point. You must be at least 13 years of age to post comments. By submitting a comment, you agree to these
Terms of Service
You must be logged in to leave a comment. Login or register See all comments |